You can not both eat your cake and have it too.
You can not both say that they want the wolf there and eradicate it. Yesterday I discussed the wolf by Erik A Eriksson (C) i radio Värmland.

This is due to Eric's party colleague, also the Environment, Lena Ek went out last week and said she wants to reduce the already threatened vargstamman from around 300 only 180 Wolves.

Ek's statement conflicts with the Environmental Protection Agency, which says that 380 is a minimum limit if you get a high enough immigration of wolves. A level that is lower than the staliga predator investigation and even lower than the Commission's international research panel.

Yesterday Erik A Eriksson tried to make it sound like it is with regard to the wolf that you want to shoot the trunk. It is to try to bring the majority of Swedish people who want the wolf left behind light. Honesty lasts the longest. Better to talk about whether you want to eat the cake and have it too ...

For me it is obvious that we must protect the wolf. Like the other countries must protect its tigers, polar bears and other endangered predators.

But we must take joint responsibility for the costs. It is not fårägarna to pay. I do not understand why the government cut back on compensation to the owners affected. Next year 20 percent, 10 million.

Erik A Eriksson wanted to argue that the wolf is a major problem for rural people. But we are living in rural areas have a greater problem than the wolf. As job losses, Schools and shops closed down. And the trains stop stop ...

440_433172583410249_1835969367_n

Källa: Stina.mpbloggar.se