Admittedly, the union of the agreement with the government relinquished to disseminate objective information about wolf, but it does not think the union representatives to spread directly misinformation, writes Jan Berg Tribe.

answer toAnders Olsson (NWT 20/10).

The number of wolves in Varmland must be reduced, writes Hunters Association Chairman of Varmland Anders Olsson in a post in the Värmland predators debate that was recorded in the NWT 20 oktober. He believes that the Värmland wolf population is too dense. As proof for this densification, he argues that the county affected by 33 wolfterritories, either with family or groups with turf marking pairs.

When I read the official Final Report of Viltskadecenter from last winter's inventory, I see that Varmland affected by 26 wolfterritories the end of the counting. Anders Olsson's assertion 33 territory, then, seven for many.

Of them 26 home ranges is 14 border territory shared with either Norway or Örebro County. To get the right idea of ​​how many wolves a county has counted gränsreviren with half of each county / country they overlap. Of them 14 gränsreviren thus includes seven Varmland. So there is 19 turf in the county, spread over nine family groups and ten wolf pairs. I read that Olsson could possibly think of one to two territories in Varmland, so I understand that even 19 turf is too many in his world.

> Read more